A controversial video from Nigeria’s Olabisi Onabanjo University (OOU) has sparked a social media storm and ignited a fiery debate around personal privacy, dress codes, and cultural norms. The now-viral footage appears to show female university staff physically inspecting female students by touching their chests before allowing them to enter the examination hall, to confirm whether or not they are wearing bras.
The video, which has rapidly gained traction online, has divided opinions across the internet and within the Nigerian academic community.
Internet Divided: Outrage vs Support
The footage has been condemned by a large section of the public, with users calling it “harassment,” “a violation of human rights,” and an act of public shaming. One concerned user tweeted, “This is harassment. People may have medical or personal reasons for not wearing bras. This is unacceptable.” Another went further, demanding legal action: “This is a clear human rights abuse. Sue them!”
However, not everyone is on the same side of the fence. Some users, along with the university’s Student Union President, Muizz Olatunji, have defended the university’s actions. According to Olatunji, the “No Bra, No Entry” rule is not new, and forms part of an institutional dress code aimed at preserving discipline and decency on campus. He emphasized that the policy exists to prevent distractions and promote a respectful academic environment.
Cultural Norms vs Bodily Autonomy
Nigeria is a deeply traditional and religious society where modest dressing is often considered a social expectation, particularly in public spaces. Supporters of the policy argue that not wearing undergarments, especially in academic settings, is inappropriate and disrespectful to cultural values.
But critics say otherwise. For many, the idea that students can be physically checked for their underwear is nothing short of a gross invasion of personal privacy. Legal and human rights activists warn that such actions could fall under the categories of sexual harassment, gender-based discrimination, and institutional abuse.
“It’s not about what one chooses to wear or not wear—it’s about the manner in which institutions enforce these policies,” said a women’s rights advocate in Lagos. “Touching students to check their underwear crosses the line into unacceptable behavior.”
Student Union’s Role: Seeking Middle Ground
While Olatunji backed the intention behind the policy, he acknowledged growing concerns from the student body and pledged to work with university authorities to develop a more respectful and less intrusive method of enforcement.
“We understand the goal is to uphold discipline, but we must also ensure that students’ dignity and comfort are not compromised,” he added. The union is reportedly working on dialogue-based alternatives, such as issuing dress code warnings or conducting awareness campaigns instead of invasive checks.
Dress Codes in Nigerian Universities: A Deep-Rooted Practice
Most Nigerian universities maintain strict dress codes. For example, female students are often prohibited from wearing mini-skirts or revealing outfits, while male students may not be allowed to wear dreadlocks, earrings, or ripped jeans.
But as policies begin to interfere with bodily autonomy and personal freedom, more students and social commentators are demanding a re-evaluation. “Discipline should not come at the cost of human dignity,” said a law professor from the University of Ibadan.
The Broader Question: Where Do We Draw the Line?
This incident at OOU raises broader questions about how far institutions can or should go to enforce cultural values. Can dress codes be enforced without violating personal boundaries? Are such measures truly about morality—or do they reflect outdated and patriarchal control over women’s bodies?
While the debate continues, the OOU controversy has undeniably opened a much-needed national conversation about respect, privacy, and modern educational policies in Nigeria.
